- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old' {- A% l1 I' p5 ~/ n
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
& g* D1 K! O7 g: xExposure to Testosterone( j8 j/ O! f8 g4 S9 r6 m
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
) G- S$ I8 R( R: u4 V h" cand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
8 ]- z: }# i+ _: }* fClinical Pediatrics- d" _, u0 K, Y( D) R( } V$ c
Volume 46 Number 6
|( _4 | l {3 R9 `July 2007 540-543
2 A( D& g' m3 |/ L1 w1 |$ K© 2007 Sage Publications
|) m6 c4 U8 y1 |8 B# r d10.1177/0009922806296651, _7 P1 o- L5 g5 t+ ^
http://clp.sagepub.com( W: I+ j- k$ H. a
hosted at& `* S& o1 j8 m+ X m
http://online.sagepub.com
1 e- T( x( k( v3 \" R7 y0 }Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
, R$ j. ^8 l6 B% G" l+ ]2 sis a significant concern for physicians. Central
$ |9 ~8 B$ r4 h! p S; eprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated, ]! U$ {: A ^" d L# s5 v' O( |
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
- D$ @) R1 W9 q& f* G" P5 {, ca higher incidence of organic central nervous system
: [7 D+ f- D/ x0 A$ f& L, llesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested3 @" F6 v( f! `
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
' N( s/ z& H3 G9 m2 K# uhair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
9 x% y1 z5 \, Mcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We h+ m$ d: ^) K1 X$ J7 r. D5 x
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the: i1 V! |+ Y5 F* ]$ U
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-" F+ B. l: L9 U
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due/ i1 G! [4 G% v5 @( E5 L. x8 O
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by. {/ h- T2 |- h* X: |- u9 [, T
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-$ v1 f5 T% |0 b0 `+ g
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this0 U: f; v! _9 {! s
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of6 j4 H. @. F/ t2 B& i! b
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
7 ]0 J% f0 b% U6 V5 s! c9 {bly more common than the rare case report in the
' I+ M* Q* [) ^0 W' `" j" S( v' ]literature.4: _* W( q4 A2 |/ `0 u: E, T
Patient Report# C$ q: Q+ X# @ F6 Z$ F
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
; E1 j) `0 G( H, H) f q4 `7 Uendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern0 F0 _5 H4 P# F I( B
of early sexual development. His mother noticed5 L! t" x4 N3 f8 Z+ K) O+ A
light colored pubic hair development when he was; {* p- A5 k! p; @ A0 N
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of& o2 x0 v- T- c+ O) i
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
9 S% ?, U6 P DAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE," M( c% p! f& B
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
: S% J7 q `# b" X* _2 w. oMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;/ X/ g$ p9 r4 s: x: w/ S
e-mail: [email protected].
0 O9 _* Q2 p. X" Y: v, v0 |about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became8 N( T$ D$ n5 I5 K
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-. E9 x3 \$ a3 D& f7 f, W$ W7 p
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
( d: I- D7 @! T* i v$ gwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with! a1 w0 J' l g s* m, v( J5 S
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of( i6 i( O5 z$ o" R. P/ F5 I
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year- F" x4 x4 D. V( r" T8 h
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with4 `. D- ^' b4 X" _/ h
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,0 M9 T, h" A( a9 x
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development9 J2 `1 j, E9 F7 ?0 e
was age appropriate.9 R! n' @' n3 l
The family history was remarkable for the father,
( R: B7 p4 V/ G% iwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
6 |$ Y% P% \1 O8 }: Wwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
7 N) T$ t$ @/ Kheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
]7 q0 l( t# C- V6 v: q. V) Cearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
# l4 n8 ~( V3 o* G8 Q! x; QThe father denied taking any other medication. The
; V- y8 j( [3 k. g1 c2 P" ~child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche; Y( Q) C* s) a( E7 b
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
3 S9 a7 @2 @- b% _( s: P# O5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
% Z0 L: O& E4 b0 i0 Q- Acocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-2 W+ \$ S' V1 m B) p! X
tives. There were no siblings.+ h! k+ n% L; h% T/ u9 ^
Physical Examination
5 c/ \" [: h* aThe physical examination revealed a very active,+ c: D" R r2 C. B! X! A
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented2 D$ [- |% `0 n
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was5 O8 U# T) C# Q0 N
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg; C0 `3 c7 y4 ]+ I& [, _* s
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
- U' q8 V9 j$ g9 p" K; V4 ~$ m. fvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
8 S9 L0 Z( P3 y' a: Fthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.4 _, [9 z1 Y. p
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
9 i% j% g; m" }' i- penlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of$ E9 b, y J9 \) a
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
: K J" T$ i4 ^; ydeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
6 j% D' }5 \/ B t0 _540
! Y, C+ t3 p) _. M7 k6 fat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from* t) j5 d- D) B( l; O# [# Y
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
9 p6 f7 a2 x4 B$ Htesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
# F4 B5 z( b0 y: k5 [1 dThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
. a+ ?, P/ {# A) w$ Q, joily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
$ \ m5 R8 Z$ p; u6 E, zabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
* \6 Q9 h/ K; w2 c3 F7 lNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+7 D4 D' l, k' y8 W* v
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion7 Z- \- h+ l; R9 D
of papilledema.
e) S0 y/ A+ C- X# Y3 V( k- ?: DLaboratory Evaluation: s. y7 l! q( s2 V& B
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
, h; l% k \3 X. `( Q6 c0 K5 Dusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
, C, S4 S" ~* e7 j9 G, _# D9 F @; Qlogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal$ W6 x9 I7 n1 a ?, O
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test+ o" t* e4 m+ G( M9 \
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-0 D7 W# Y7 V% A$ R T- o
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
1 ?! |, l. r# }0 L9 ]' L6 \The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood. ?# p( z$ q' s( O* G& p# O; {3 l+ A
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
/ q6 t4 ]( L; y uwithin normal range for his age. The concentration# i4 ~, t! E; I& ^ K
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL5 g! x5 W& y3 L/ r0 g0 _5 A- A
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
: n" {& h* R, f: k/ xng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-4 B, I( \4 n* D$ ~- d2 V7 t! b
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
6 S4 R }7 J! X" tdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to) |4 k3 P2 E' a8 h# Z0 G
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S), L4 c" [( C' z& K; U3 S6 F
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
; F5 U2 |7 @! x8 o7 L$ d Ttisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
2 S* J1 v* p9 z' C. x$ E' Ztestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
; s% W% y* @5 ` a" Land β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
# h/ }' ~8 d' f# j5 h; I5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular! q& j& x5 ~" x* v8 v0 \' {
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
) x" O2 m# T( @+ b% \5 kconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
, j+ H/ f, B5 u+ k. x(prepubertal).
$ P$ Q% q- {+ l6 ~The parents were notified about the laboratory- L: C$ q+ D: \* x# |9 E; T5 l& L
results and were informed that all of the tests were- l+ l+ {) b. z2 L& E
normal except the testosterone level was high. The
# {4 z [$ W& d! Cfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
$ u+ \) v, T4 H2 Mobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
5 ^ w# r8 z4 o6 c1 G6 p( Oever, the family did not return for 4 months. o6 ]' M" `% ^9 ~% M7 n8 Z/ E
Physical examination at this time revealed that the1 v5 b6 ], S# [- x. a
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
! g j1 X! O8 [" y2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
}! g, w- p$ _" r, n! ounchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-" U+ e! b( |% B& r4 [0 r( m
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
3 {3 X/ G# L8 a" p% `) rthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
, w( L7 h q! b$ ]9 LmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.4 r) g, ~9 g$ |6 e! |
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
8 ~5 [7 T; U$ Q, q. e ?ing frequent erections.
4 j- G/ I- U/ i3 E& [$ @Both parents were again questioned about use of' V" b/ ^ h! n5 B3 {' ~
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to
2 T& V0 S! D- R+ bthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
+ }# e9 M4 i6 S0 b/ x# DTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5410 ?: a) j' k! J6 X2 r7 S
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
# g- d- H! b! B+ L5 zing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for5 v4 K' M; ^9 v& E
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
* J9 ?/ h# p s( L' Y2 |to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-9 m5 a' q7 ]6 d! Y+ U, [
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
4 j" d9 g" z* ksecondary to depression.$ z! ?* O. l. V) T
The child slept in the same bed with parents.
* g2 n( e. w# v4 uThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
6 r$ R8 [$ g+ D+ y" kchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
+ p9 D) M/ l' S' M- A' Enificant bare skin contact between baby and father.# B, a! t6 f: U- C9 a3 y4 a
The father also admitted that after the phone call,
7 s' B, b( u( r& h5 d4 V/ m" d, ^7 gwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby I v s3 e: T
was high, he then read the product information& D+ C$ F/ V c
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
5 K" z4 W- ]' A3 H; V2 zson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they& X$ z* p( h' W+ Q. \8 A8 j
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the- V: `# a2 E/ e4 z& z$ S( |
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had' c8 K; n) F c r! C8 _
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
' {& l! V( r. R4 |+ J4 |$ X: m6 qtest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
! S# i& M+ E+ T/ ^7 V4 hlaboratory to obtain the test.2 o# n) Z. H5 W7 v
Discussion
! I' ?. r# v8 P. f, p% p4 W0 d# DPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary6 A1 ]' Z- v5 Q& U. z. ~/ H
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
/ t$ O9 I/ L+ C9 @% W E' JPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
x; z2 p4 [ p4 @+ t5 Qit is caused by the premature activation of hypo- O8 c6 p, V, D; l7 q* j( j
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
: ^2 }! h- T/ v% |1 |, z) g! {mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP" j3 L5 d# o( g
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
8 R5 J; s! j% S; Zresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-) n* |" |7 c& a1 \7 F2 M* |
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-: j! J3 _+ {0 Q. D/ e8 t
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
# _# [, k, Y0 _ d: l6 Nboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-3 D1 l: w. [- W
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-; Y. b1 k1 l# \3 n4 g' h! N5 x
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by' B; j8 j5 e. z: f' M
gonadotropins.1,32 }: g; u* C2 ~) u( ~
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-' u2 t, y* J* H, y2 x; L+ [
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
* M! ]4 g* `+ q. s- C" }- Oandrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or
% z2 _: {4 N9 R. s/ v$ h2 {exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
: _* y8 h8 _. a5 ~/ v/ |ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing# a3 G1 T( z/ o0 X4 N# B
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
. U! _; J" r$ u* @% @$ Qadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious# w; n2 h! }5 b' [
puberty in boys.3,4
. g5 X- H' W2 v/ rThe most common form of congenital adrenal/ b; [" e+ `( n) j9 [5 k% @
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
) u! F9 |% ~4 u- m4 o4 H+ l3 f+ WThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in) F; D2 u4 s) ]$ O8 U1 ~
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,( Z- G( n8 g+ [! g6 }! I/ V
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen8 V9 M! V* m3 A8 L9 X" ?5 C
excess.1,3
" g2 ^, r3 e+ Fat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
0 I" n3 [5 Q4 S) _& M* t3 c542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20079 |$ s6 ]7 {& \$ {0 j7 _
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
( J% @% T& o0 n: `/ \independent precocious puberty, which is also known- c+ S0 K2 Q# {' O, n8 W
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a* [; `, i/ a s7 i& S. [
very young age. The physical findings in these boys
+ k; \3 ?. u' Z' A* gwith this disorder are full pubertal development,
! v: P& U! J! y% iincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
+ L% i7 n" ~! Mwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder7 ]' Y+ i& r9 a* p$ g
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
% x8 h" P' |/ T6 R7 @* Spubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
* W' I" b$ m3 z; oreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked# R9 z4 J. K( e# Q' f% p* [( T
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only g- K& s6 C6 g
males; therefore, other male members of the family
4 `9 h5 M+ d# _4 A; Wmay have similar precocious puberty.3/ f( p$ v2 b% f3 O p, K
In our patient, physical examination was incon-# m- e* V% P1 F) N l
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-; G) w8 f4 Z+ {9 ~) y' |
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
% j! ]& ^! I, ?( g/ \( |: q# k' ]& G5 Kwas in the differential diagnosis because his father
. J y2 K. z: r" R9 T# n5 vstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally," Q. ^8 ]; Y0 s5 G. E
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
9 N. L& K& f/ nbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
, Y: G7 @/ R& E* C j8 u8 Vative initial history of androgen exposure, our
! Z: c, ^$ z' a& o3 C" ubiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,' X, R- _8 p2 B5 {7 g* ^
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
7 k5 Q/ H# e8 |3 N8 D( g: Tdeficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-/ \$ Q. t/ J2 E. u% R) T
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.( J# Z- u; R# v9 T# W8 {5 P
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly9 L# ]& t4 c& B
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because' M. i" n3 j& t. a6 f( s
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-0 Q! Y1 N/ G9 [, i
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
# f% X$ e# s9 C% g0 l! edecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
* Q% T2 a. ?; b' nterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was" a5 X$ `! ^$ _
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
7 W4 |/ s. R+ D7 gDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
- x. ~& b3 ?6 B# f4 Dcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to" E l! X+ {% ^% W8 y6 N+ a h
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.
# w ?( u I2 gSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
0 W8 T( l5 a7 S# fbaseline value in those females who were exposed to
- l3 Z" L/ b2 j2 t" O: h( s5 Q1 ?% d2 ]* ]even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male. p" Z1 z3 j9 M, ~
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
" e2 C3 Q: b v( j1 l R7 u* C0 [( Stion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
) E3 y- c2 E$ p# ?! {, mOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,' z6 E% H% C" k* c
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
+ D8 x9 J1 X& ?1 r$ t& n: [dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-/ b9 Z# z% {3 u q
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more2 c" I& s1 b* o
active in young children exposed to testosterone
" P0 u( h6 n! P) N' A2 Cexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-5 }: E/ h7 B7 ~8 H: n
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
4 N3 m( `% U+ A4 R, e* Svirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in8 H6 g# K5 x6 z6 Y
children results in an increase in growth velocity and
2 h( ^9 V' T: z+ U x0 ^advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
; C# A/ E( ]" {: | PThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during; U+ r$ c, I9 Q4 T/ K
early childhood on pubertal development and final
0 l% u6 x& V2 [9 Jadult height are not fully known and always remain& s) R7 w% p( u4 D F
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
0 ~8 r* l! T- a( n: D( u# ?: Fterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
4 v+ T8 y# z0 z% h' o4 [acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
i3 U! r; c9 l/ Y( n& vcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
4 X3 z/ @1 G a. M5 m+ T. X; I+ Zdecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
$ ^' |1 T, \6 c* u* T$ rThere are conflicting reports and controversy
& M: X( k. [3 _0 q+ H) d1 V$ s& gover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult# X% r% u$ q% q8 \3 R) k
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
7 Q" C0 h: ^+ h) v0 X0 \adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
# v$ r, r& R7 E Iulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
5 v/ B7 i, b" s' {0 m8 @$ P$ FSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
% V. d. y. D8 q3 l. ]1 |childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
3 @; z+ T5 j. l; r0 Fpenile length in clinical studies.; W1 @ U1 S$ B
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
, i' j2 B+ Y! u0 sgoing to experience any of the untoward effects from
# T" a0 |- y! ?3 Xtestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
/ E. ]. G# w. {( _" Ethe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.4 M; h. K% y6 x O! Q
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of& @7 ]- S4 A% Q: o% g
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at, j; Q, B6 L) Q: Q+ M: B7 Z
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
+ }: [& \! Y7 C7 \ ?. yheight will not be affected.6 X2 L% u) G5 o2 W" |
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-) n4 V/ M) p2 m; r+ l
ability of androgen products in our society may
- ]* e* ^6 O% H3 mindeed cause more virilization in male or female- V" w4 d: G8 ~3 m: m
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-0 p X2 m- {( J, f& Y( _
gen products must be considered and specific ques-
# @' E* F. b% E# m3 k$ `! Gtioning about the use of a testosterone product or
' M/ K% L1 [2 P; ^ ngel should be asked of the family members during
: I% X: v% r. f8 T. n; Q, [the evaluation of any children who present with vir-+ \9 O& T# J4 ~( H: i& J+ x
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
* C+ c1 t1 y! K/ G& O& [4 pnosis can be established by just a few tests and by Z5 U8 s: Q/ G! L* ~
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a. d+ o7 g. J: E2 v
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
, `% t! `; U. k$ L$ Mresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive7 a- A9 Q8 y3 m: X
investigation. The primary care physician should be1 G/ ~6 |% n4 _# }& U
aware of this fact, because most of these children9 T! t- j, ~6 N" k2 }% v
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
$ g8 P( L) P+ v: jDesk Reference and package insert should also put a
3 W) e3 ]! C, ~warning about the virilizing effect on a male or) I+ L8 w; R2 P r' f
female child who might come in contact with some-5 o+ J$ s5 D; p8 A% u# m# W
one using any of these products.8 g2 b1 ]& s3 Z8 a3 O: a- Q+ T
References
( L4 Y9 U7 G# L, G, w1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation9 q. R$ T6 C7 H! N @% l0 S1 U9 P
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
9 l; W C4 d! YEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
4 @3 `, x; s, T: Z2 {1 b$ ~; m2002: 565-628.+ Q$ |" S) u" O8 d9 F
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious. j$ ?2 O3 o( x5 r
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|